Latest Judgments

Seema Sapra v. Court on its Own Motion

We have heard the petitioner in-person.

(A.M. Khanwilkar and Ajay Rastogi, JJ.)

Seema Sapra ______________________________________ Appellant;

v.

Court on its Own Motion ___________________________ Respondent.

Criminal Appeal D. No. 10342/2016, decided on April 11, 2019

(IA 122625/2017, 123144/2017, 127773/2017, 128666/2017, 30030/2018, 112422/2018 (Applications for summoning original record, seeking directions for hearing by a Five Judge Constitution Bench, appropriate orders/directions, condonation of delay in filing appeal, recalling the court’s order dated 07.02.2018 and place on record documents from Delhi High Court) With W.P.(C) No. 13/2018 (X) (IA No. 4015/2018-Permission to appear and argue in-person IA 61232/2019-Application for appropriate orders/directions) W.P.(C) No. 001027/2018 (X) (For Admission and IA No. 122904/2018-Permission to Appear and Argue in Person)

The Order of the court was delivered by


Order

1. We have heard the petitioner in-person.

2. She is at liberty to file additional documents, which were referred to during the course of argument or any further document(s) which she intends to file.

3. She prays for four weeks’ time to do so.

4. Appropriate order will be passed after the additional document(s) are filed.

5. After hearing the petitioner in-person for almost two hours and this order being dictated, the petitioner submits that this Bench should not hear these matters.

6. Even this submission will be considered in the order that we may pass after considering the document(s).

7. Orders reserved.

———

Exit mobile version