(Deepak Gupta, J.)
Seema Sapra _____________________________________ Appellant;
v.
Court on its Own Motion ____________________________ Respondent.
Criminal Appeal D No(s). 10342/2016 (IA No. 94822/2017), decided on October 9, 2017
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. Various objections have been raised by the Registry and each one is dealt with separately as follows :
Objection No. 1 – Appellant-in-person is granted two weeks’ time to file the complete memo of parties.
Objection No. 2 – Overruled.
Objection No. 3 – Appellant-in-person states that she will produce Appendix/Annexures before the Court at the time of hearing. She is permitted to do so.
Objection No. 4 – Appellant-in-person is granted two weeks’ time to file certified copy of the impugned order1.
Objection No. 5 – Overruled.
Objection No. 6 – Appellant-in-person states that her email address is seema.sapra@gmail.com. This objection is satisfied.
Objection No. 7 – Since appellant is appearing in person, this objection is overruled.
Objection No. 8 – Appellant-in-person is granted two weeks’ time to file true copies of the orders mentioned therein.
Objection No. 9 – To be dealt with by the Court at the time of hearing of the matter.
Objection No. 10 – Overruled.
Objection No. 11 – When the matter is listed before the Court, Registry may indicate what according to it is the period of delay.
Objection No. 12 – As the appelalnt is appearing in person and she is a lawyer, on her oral request to appear and argue in person, she is permitted to appear and argue in person.
Objection No. 13 – Appellant-in-person states that she will produce Annexures before the Court at the time of hearing. She is permitted to do so.
Objection No. 14 – Overruled.
Objection No. 15 – Overruled.
Objection No. 16 – The Appellant-in-person is convicted for contempt of Court. As she has filed the appeal in person, she is exempted from surrendering.
2. On the appellant removing Objection Nos. 1, 4 and 8 within the prescribed time, matter be listed before the appropriate Bench in the week thereafter.
3. Appellant-in-person has also made a prayer that she may be permitted to carry laptop/stroller bag inside the court-room. Prayer is allowed subject to thorough checking of the belongings by the security officers and such bag should not be exceeding the cabin bag size.
———
1 Court on its Own Motion v. Seema Sapra, 2015 SCC OnLine Del 14079 : (2016) 154 DRJ 185
