(Kurian Joseph and R. Banumathi, JJ.)
Satish Kumar etc. _________________________________ Appellant(s)
v.
State of Haryana & Ors. ___________________________ Respondent(s)
Civil Appeal Nos. 9358-9360 of 2017 [@ Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 13488-13490 of 2017], decided on July 20, 2017
The Judgement of the Court was delivered by
Kurian, J.:—
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. The appellants are aggrieved since they are not granted enhancement of compensation in respect of their land. When these matters came up before this Court on 13.07.2017, this Court passed the following order:—
“Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve a copy of these special leave petitions on the Standing Counsel for the State of Haryana.
Learned Standing Counsel for the State of Haryana is directed to get instruction as to whether these petitions are covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Civil Appeal No. 3412/2015 etc. titled Sachin v. State of Haryana Dated 31.03.2015.
List on 20.07.2017.”
4. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents, on instruction, submits that the appellants are similarly situated as the appellants in Civil Appeal No. 3412/2015 (titled Sachin v. State of Haryana).
5. Therefore, these appeals are allowed in terms of the judgment dated 31.03.2015 rendered in Civil Appeal No. 3412/2015 etc., which shall form part of this judgment.
6. However, we make it clear that the appellants herein shall not be entitled for any statutory benefits for the period covered by any delay either before the High Court or before this Court.
7. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
8. There shall be no orders as to costs.
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).13488-13490/2017
Satish Kumar etc ________________________________ Petitioner(s)
v.
State of Haryana & Ors ___________________________ Respondent(s)
Date: 20-07-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
(Before Kurian Joseph and R. Banumathi, JJ.)
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ritesh Khatri, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. Alok Sangwan, AAG
Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv.
For Ms. Monika Gusain, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Order
9. Delay condoned.
10. Leave granted.
11. The appeals are allowed in terms of the signed judgment.
———
