(J. Chelameswar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ.)
Sara Haj Service __________________________________ Petitioner
v.
Union of India ___________________________________ Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 508 of 2017, decided on May 8, 2018
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. We have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Respondent sought to dispute the receipt of the application sent by the petitioner by post for Category I registration. However, with the rejoinder the petitioner has filed the proof of having sent such an application by courier service. To this aspect, despite time taken, there is no rebuttal.
3. Result of the aforesaid is that the petitioner has to be treated as having been duly applied for registration under Category I in 2017 which was wrongfully denied to him on account of the application not being taken up. For any further consideration of Registration in Category I, this period has, thus, to be counted in favour of the petitioner.
4. Insofar as year 2018 is concerned, the petitioner has already applied and learned counsel for the respondent states that the application of the petitioner shall be duly considered as he meets the requirement of number of years of providing service for consideration under Category I.
5. His statement is taken on record.
6. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 508/2017
Sara Haj Service ___________________________________ Petitioner
v.
Union of India _____________________________________ Respondent
(FOR ADMISSION and IA No. 54298/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS)
Date: 08-05-2018 This matter was called on for hearing today.
(Before J. Chelameswar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ.)
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Santhosh Krishnan, Adv.
Mr. Sayid Marzook Bafaki, AOR
For Respondent(s) Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG
Mr. Bhuvan Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Sachin Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Hemant Arya, Adv.
Mr. Sumit Goel, Adv.
Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Adv.
For Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
ORDER
7. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
8. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the signed order.
9. Pending applications stand disposed of.
———
