Latest Judgments

Sabu Mathew George v. Union of India & Ors.

It is submitted by Mr. Sanjay Parekh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that, the order passed on 28.01.2015 is not followed by the respondent nos. 3, 4 and 5, namely, Yahoo, Google and Micro Soft inasmuch such advertisements which were prohibited by virtue of that order are still being depicted. Mr. Parekh has filed a compilation indicating that till 19.02.2015, advertisements were shown by the search engines. Let the same be served on the learned counsel for the said respondents within three days from today. Response thereto be filed within a week therefrom.


 

(Dipak Misra and Prafulla C. Pant, JJ.)


 


Sabu Mathew George __________ Petitioner


 


v.


 


Union of India & Ors. __________ Respondent(s)


 


Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 341/2008, decided on March 26, 2015


 


The Order of the court was delivered by


Order


 


It is submitted by Mr. Sanjay Parekh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that, the order passed on 28.01.2015 is not followed by the respondent nos. 3, 4 and 5, namely, Yahoo, Google and Micro Soft inasmuch such advertisements which were prohibited by virtue of that order are still being depicted. Mr. Parekh has filed a compilation indicating that till 19.02.2015, advertisements were shown by the search engines. Let the same be served on the learned counsel for the said respondents within three days from today. Response thereto be filed within a week therefrom.


 


Be it noted, learned counsel appearing for the said respondents seriously disputed the allegations made by Mr. Sanjay Parekh. Be that as it may, the said aspect shall be adverted to after the copy of the compilation is served on the learned counsel for the respondents and response thereto is filed after a week therefrom as fixed hereinabove.


 


Let the matter be listed in the last week of April, 2015.


 


———


 


 

Exit mobile version