(Sanjiv Khanna and J.K. Maheshwari, JJ.)
Raychem RPG Ltd. ________________________________ Appellant;
v.
Commissioner of Central Excise Palghar _____________ Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. of 2022 (@ Diary No(s). 25819 of 2022), decided on October 14, 2022
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. Delay condoned.
2. We do not find any good ground and reason to interfere with the impugned judgment, which in our opinion rightly invoked Rule 11 of the Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000 (in short “the Valuation Rules). With regard to the period of limitation, the shorter period as prescribed in Section 11A of the Central Excise Act and has been invoked and applied by the Tribunal.
3. Recording the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed.
4. Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 25819/2022
M/s. Raychem RPG Ltd ______________________________ Petitioner
v.
Commissioner of Central Excise Palghar ________________ Respondent
(IA No. 144638/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No. 144639/2022-EX-PARTE STAY)
Date : 14-10-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.
(Before Sanjiv Khanna and J.K. Maheshwari, JJ.)
UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following
ORDER
5. Delay condoned.
6. The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order.
7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
———
