Latest Judgments

Rashid v. The State of Uttar Pradesh

We are not inclined to interfere with the order of the High Court dismissing the bail application of the petitioner.

(A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan, JJ.)

Rashid _________________________________________ Petitioner

v.

The State of Uttar Pradesh _________________________ Respondent

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4919/2018, decided on July 2, 2018

The Order of the court was delivered by

Order

1. We are not inclined to interfere with the order of the High Court dismissing the bail application of the petitioner. However, we request the High Court to make an endeavour to decide the appeal within a period of one year. In case the appeal is not decided in the aforesaid period the petitioner shall be entitled to renew his request for bail.

2. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner.

3. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

———

Exit mobile version