(Kurian Joseph, Deepak Gupta and Hemant Gupta, JJ.)
Ram Raj Chaurasia _________________________________ Appellant
v.
Sharda Devi & Anr. _____________________________ Respondent(s)
Civil Appeal No. 8066 of 2015, decided on November 20, 2018
The Judgement of the Court was delivered by
Kurian, J.:—
1. The appellant is the tenant. He was evicted on the ground of requirement of the landlord for reconstruction. It is the case of the appellant that on account of collusion between the landlord and the builder, no reconstruction is taking place and virtually, he is devoid of his livelihood.
2. There is no representation on behalf of the second respondent, who is the builder. It is the case of the first respondent-landlord that actually it is the collusion between the appellant and the builder.
3. Be that as it may, we find that the appellant has been evicted in the year 2015 on the ground of need for reconstruction. Now that the appellant has been evicted, it is for him to work out his remedy available to him under law. Without prejudice to such liberty, this appeal is disposed of.
4. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.
Civil Appeal No(s). 8066/2015
Ram Raj Chaurasia _________________________________ Appellant
v.
Sharda Devi & Anr ______________________________ Respondent(s)
(IA 105185/2018)
Date : 20-11-2018 This matter was called on for hearing today.
(Before Kurian Joseph, Deepak Gupta and Hemant Gupta, JJ.)
For Appellant(s) Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh, Adv.
Mr. Prem Prakash, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy, AOR
Dr. Nafis A. Siddiqui, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
ORDER
5. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed nonreportable Judgment.
6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.
———
