(N.V. Ramana, Arun Mishra, Rohinton Fali Nariman, R. Banumathi and Ashok Bhushan, JJ.)
Pawan Kumar Gupta _______________________________ Petitioner;
v.
State of N.C.T. of Delhi ___________________________ Respondent.
Curative Petition (Criminal) ………..D. No. 8243 of 2020 In Review Petition (Criminal) No. 671 of 2017 In Criminal Appeal No. 608 of 2017, decided on March 2, 2020
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. The application for oral hearing is rejected.
2. The application for stay of execution of death sentence is also rejected.
3. We have gone through the Curative Petition and the relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra, reported in 2002 (4) SCC 388. Hence, the Curative Petition is dismissed.
4. As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of.
CURATIVE PETITION(CRL) ………Diary No(s).8243/2020 In R.P. (Crl.) No. 671/2017 in CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 608/2017
Pawan Kumar Gupta _________________________________ Petitioner
v.
The State of N.C.T. of Delhi _________________________ Respondent
IA No. 37949/2020 – ORAL HEARING
IA No. 37956/2020 – PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
IA No. 37954/2020 – STAY OF EXECUTION OF SENTENCE OF DEATH
Date : 02-03-2020 This matter was circulated today.
(Before N.V. Ramana, Arun Mishra, Rohinton Fali Nariman, R. Banumathi and Ashok Bhushan, JJ.)
By Circulation
UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
ORDER
5. The application for oral hearing is rejected.
6. The application for stay of execution of death sentence is also rejected.
7. The Curative Petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.
8. As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of.
———
