(Arun Mishra and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.)
Nirmal Manoj Parekh _______________________________ Petitioner
v.
Malika Nirmal Parekh _____________________________ Respondent
Review Petition (C) Nos. 1954-1955 of 2018 in Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 8357-8358 of 2018, decided on July 12, 2018
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. Application for permission to appear and argue in person is rejected.
2. Delay condoned.
3. We have perused the Review Petitions and record of the special leave petitions and are convinced that the order of which review has been sought does not suffer from any error apparent warranting its reconsideration.
4. The Review Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. As a sequel to the dismissal of the review petitions, all the pending applications, i.e., for directions, permission to file additional documents, permission for deletion of some annexures etc., stand disposed of.
R.P.(C) Nos. 1954-1955/2018 in SLP(C) Nos. 8357-8358/2018
Nirmal Manoj Parekh _______________________________ Petitioner
v.
Malika Nirmal Parekh ______________________________ Respondent
(With appln.(s) for permission to appear and argue in person)
Date : 12-07-2018 This petition was circulated today.
(Before Arun Mishra and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.)
By circulation
UPON perusing papers, the Court made the following
ORDER
5. Application for permission to appear and agrue in person is rejected.
6. The review petitions are dismissed in terms of the signed order.
———
