(Dipak Misra, C.J. and A.M. Khanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.)
Mrs. Kanika Goel ________________________________ Appellant
v.
State of Delhi thru SHO & Anr. ___________________ Respondent(s)
Criminal Appeal Nos. 635-640/2018, decided on May 18, 2018
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. As mentioned in the first hour, the matter is taken up today.
2. Be it noted, we have listed the matter today as it relates to the conversation right of the father with the child.
3. In the course of hearing, Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-father submitted that the directions issued by this Court on earlier occasion relating to Skype contact are not being complied with.
4. Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that there has been no deviation and in any case, the mother does not intend to anyway affect, indict or intervene in the right to converse by Skype. Ms. Rajkotia has assured this Court that her client has not given any occasion to raise any grievance and if any grievance is nurtured by the father, the same shall be duly addressed, so that the order of this Court is duly complied with.
5. We are sure, the parties shall behave like compliant litigants.
———
