(Ranjan Gogoi, C.J. and S.A. Bobde, D.Y. Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ.)
Mohammad Siddiq (D) Thr. Lrs. ______________________ Appellant;
v.
Mahant Suresh Das and Others _____________________ Respondent(s).
Civil Appeal No(s). 10866-10867/2010, decided on August 2, 2019
(For Directions)
With
C.A. Nos. 4768-4771/2011 (III-A) C.A. No. 2636/2011 (III-A) C.A. No. 821/2011 (III-A) C.A. No. 4739/2011 (III-A) (With appln(s). for discharge of Advocate-on-Record, substitution, c/delay in filing substitution application, addition/deletion/modification of parties, vacation of interim order and for clarification/direction) C.A. Nos. 4905-4908/2011 (III-A) (With appln.(s) for clarification/direction, substitution, c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside abatement) C.A. No. 2215/2011 (III-A) C.A. No. 4740/2011 (III-A) (With appln. for clarification/direction) C.A. No. 2894/2011 (III-A) C.A. No. 6965/2011 (III-A) C.A. No. 4192/2011 (III-A) C.A. No. 5498/2011 (III-A) (With appln.(s) for substitution, c/delay in filing substitution appln., deleting the name of petitioner/respondent and exemption from filing O.T.) C.A. No. 7226/2011 (III-A) C.A. No. 8096/2011 (III-A) W.P.(C) No. 105/2016 (X) (With appln. for appropriate orders/directions) Diary No(s). 22744/2017 (XI) (With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and exemption from filing O.T.) W.P.(C) No. 294/2018 (X) (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents/facts/annexures and exemption from filing O.T.) W.P.(C) No. 151/2019 (X) (With appln. for clarification/direction)
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. We have received the report submitted by Justice (Retd.) F.M.I. Kalifulla, the Chairman of the Mediation Committee. We have perused the same.
2. The mediation proceedings have not resulted in any final settlement. We, therefore, have to proceed with the hearing of the cases/appeals, which will commence on and from 6.8.2019 (Tuesday). The hearing which will be on dayto-day basis until the arguments are concluded will start with the appeals arising out of Suit Nos. 3 and 5. The learned counsel(s) in the lead appeals as well as the learned counsel(s) who will be making lead arguments on behalf of the respondents in the appeals arising out of the aforesaid Suits may, for the convenience of the Court, indicate the pleadings and the evidence on which they propose to rely, so that the officials of the Registry can keep the said documents ready for perusal of the Court.
———
