(J. Chelameswar, Shiva Kirti Singh and Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ.)
Medical Council of India _____________________________ Appellant
v.
Malla Reddy Institute of Medical Sciences and Ors. _____ Respondent(s)
Civil Appeal No(s). 8815/2015, decided on September 2, 2016
with
SLP (C) No. 20009/2015, C.A. No. 6721-6722/2015, SLP (C) No. 35064/2015, C.A. No. 8836/2015 SLP (C) No. 17342/2015, W.P. (C) No. 646/2015, SLP (C) No. 35063/2015, SLP (C) No. 26835/2015, C.A. No. 8816/2015, SLP (C) No. 28351/2015 and SLP (C) No. 8337/2016
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8815/2015 & 8816/2015
1. The appeals are disposed of, in terms of the signed order.
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 20009/2015
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the special leave petition.
3. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 35064/2015
4. None appears for the petitioner. The special leave petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8836/2015
5. This civil appeal is allowed, in terms of the signed order.
6. Pending application (s), if any, stand disposed of.
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 8337/2016
7. The special leave petition is dismissed.
8. Application for impleadment is also dismissed.
9. C.A. No. 6721-6722/2015, SLP (C) No. 17342/2015, W.P.(C) NO. 646/2015, SLP (C) No. 35063/2015, SLP (C) No. 26835/2015 and SLP (C) No. 28351/2015
10. These matters be listed next week.
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8815 OF 2015
Medical Council of India _____________________________ Appellant
v.
Malla Reddy Institute of Medical Sciences and Ors _____ Respondent(s)
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8816 OF 2015
ORDER
11. These two appeals are filed aggrieved by the two impugned judgments passed by the Delhi High Court vide order dated 11.8.2015 in C.M. No. 13021/2015 in Writ Petition Nos. 7106/2015 and order dated 30.9.2015 in Writ Petition No. 7106/2015. The subject matter of dispute in the writ petition is the decision of the Medical Council of India rejecting the request of the respondents in each of these appeals herein for renewal of the permission to admit students in the M.B.B.S. course for the academic year 2015-2016.
12. By the impugned judgment certain directions were given by the High Court, the details of which may not be necessary for the present purpose because during the pendency of the instant appeals, this Court by an order dated 16.10.2015 stayed the operation of the impugned order. As a consequence, the respondent could not admit any student in the academic year 2015-16 and that academic year has now come to an end.
13. In the circumstances nothing survives for adjudication. The appeals are accordingly disposed of.
———
