Latest Judgments

Manish Kumar v. Union of India and Others

The prayers made in the writ petition as amended in terms of the Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2013 read as follows:

(Ranjan Gogoi, C.J. and Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ.)

Manish Kumar ____________________________________ Petitioner;

v.

Union of India and Others _________________________ Respondent(s).

Writ Petition (C) No. 183 of 2013, decided on March 11, 2019

The Order of the court was delivered by


Order

1. The prayers made in the writ petition as amended in terms of the Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2013 read as follows:

“A. Direction to all the States & Union Territories to constitute Police Commission to deal with allegation of police action, redressal of grievances of police and to make recommendations for the welfare of police force.

B. Directions to the States to formulate and implement the guidelines for prevention and control of violent mass agitations and destruction of life & property, in terms of the guidelines suggested by this Hon’ble Court in the decision reported as 2009 (5) SCC 212.

C. Directions to the States and Union Territories to fill up the vacant posts in the Police and State Armed forces so that the police forces does not remain overburdened.

D. Directions to all the States and Union Territories to provide for periodic training and upgradation of police force and to fix the working hours for the police personnel.

E. Direction to the Union of India to prescribe guidelines for the Media Reporting of the violent mass agitation and police action for prevention and control thereof.

F. Order or Direction restraining the States from drawing a presumption against the action of police acting under the constitutional and statutory obligations.”

2. From the material on record and the Orders passed by this Court from time to time it appears that one of the central issues canvassed till date is the filling up of the large number of vacancies in the different posts in the police forces in the States. In this regard detailed affidavits have been filed by a large number of States. In view of the factual matrix at some point of time it was in the contemplation of the Court that the matter be sent to High Court(s) for effective monitoring instead of this Court continuing with the present writ petition. Issue and problems are State specific and can be appropriately dealt with by the respective High Courts.

3. Having considered the matter, we are of the view that the records pertaining to each of the States including affidavits etc. be sent by the Supreme Court Registry to the Registry of the concerned High Courts with a request to Hon’ble the Chief Justice of the High Court to entertain the matter on the Judicial Side as suo motu Public Interest Litigation and monitor the prayers made from time to time.

4. With the aforesaid directions and observations, this Writ Petition shall stand disposed of.

Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 183/2013

Manish Kumar _____________________________________ Petitioner

v.

Union of India & Ors ____________________________ Respondent(s)

Date : 11-03-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.

(Before Ranjan Gogoi, C.J. and Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ.)

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manish Kumar, In-person

For Respondent(s) Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, AOR

State of Meghalaya Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, AOR

Mr. Upendra Mishra, Adv.

Mr. K.V. Kharlyngdoh, Adv.

Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AOR

Mr. M.S. Doabia, Adv.

Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR

State of Punjab Mr. Karan Bharihoke, AOR

Mr. B.D. Das, Adv.

Mr. Kaushal Narayan Mishra, Adv.

Mr. Siddhant Sharma, Adv.

Ms. Navkiran Bolay, Adv.

Mr. Gopal Singh, AOR

Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, AOR

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, AOR

State of A.P. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, AOR

Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv.

Mr. Prashant Mathur, Adv.

State of T.N. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR

Mr. Raja Rajeshwaran S., Adv.

Mr. Parthasarthi S., Adv.

Mr. Krishnayan Sen, AOR

Mr. Anil Shrivastav, AOR

Andaman & Nicobar Admn. Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran, Adv.

Ms. G. Indira, AOR

Ms. Rangoli Seth, Adv.

Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran, AOR

State of Haryana Mr. Anil Grover, AAG

Ms. Noopur Singhal, Adv.

Mr. Satish Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR

Govt. of Puducherry Mr. V. G. Pragasam, AOR

Mr. S. Prabu Ramasubramanian, Adv.

Mr. S. Manuraj, Adv.

State of Nagaland Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, AOR

Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv.

State of Jharkhand Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh, AOR

Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Adv.

Mr. Mishra Saurabh, AOR

Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR

State of Karnataka Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR

Mr. Parikshit P. Angadi, Adv.

Mr. Manender Pal Gupta, Adv.

Md. A. Ansari, Adv.

State of J & K Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR

Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv.

Mr. Gautam Parbhakar, Adv.

Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv.

State of Gujarat Ms. Hemantika Wahi, AOR

Ms. Jesal Wahi, Adv.

Ms. Puja Singh, Adv.

Ms. Vishakha, Adv.

Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Adv.

Ms. Supriya Juneja, AOR

Ms. Varsha Poddar, Adv.

Mr. P. Venkat Reddy, Adv.

Mr. Prashant Tyagi, Adv.

M/S. Venkat Palwai Law Associates, AOR

State of H.P. Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, (AAG)/AOR

Mrs. Bihu Sharma, Adv.

Ms. Purnima Krishna, Adv.

State of Orissa Dr. Anindita Pujari, AOR

Ms. Aarti Krupa Kumar, Adv.

State of W.B. Mr. Suhaan Mukerji, Adv.

Ms. Astha Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Amit Verma, Adv.

Mr. Abhishek Manchanda, Adv.

Ms. Dimple Nagpal, Adv.

M/S. PLR Chambers And Co., AOR

Jharkhand SSC Mr. Sunil Kumar, Sr. Adv.

Rohini Prasad, Adv.

Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv.

Ms. Sarla Chandra, AOR

State of UP Mr. Aviral Saxena, Adv.

Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, AOR

UOI Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG

Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv.

Mr. A.P. Mayee, Adv.

Mr. Bhakti Vardhan Singh, Adv.

Mr. Anirudh B., Adv.

Mr. A.K. Sharma, AOR (Law & Justice)

Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, AOR (Delhi Admn.)

Ms. Anil Katiyar, AOR (UTs)

Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Adv. (UTs)

Mr. M.K. Maroria, AOR

Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR

Ms. Sunita Shrivastava, Adv.

Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv.

Ms. Meetali Gupta, Adv.

Mr. A.K. Shrivastava, Adv.

State of Chhattisgarh Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, AOR

Mr. Aman Nandrajog, Adv.

Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Adv.

Mr. Surya Kant Mishra, Adv.

State of Sikkim Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv.

Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Adv.

Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Adv.

Ms. Geetanjali, Adv.

M/S. Arputham Aruna And Co, AOR

State of Mizoram Mr. Siddhesh Kotwal, Adv.

Ms. Bansuri Swaraj, Adv.

Ms. Shreya Bhatnagar, Adv.

Mr. Raghunatha Sethupathy, Adv.

Mr. Gagan Narang, Adv.

Ms. Arshiya Ghose, Adv.

Ms. Astha Sharma, AOR

State of Maharashtra Ms. Deepa M. Kulkarni, Adv.

Mr. Nishant R. katneshwarkar, AOR

State of Goa & UOI Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG

Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Adv.

Mr. Salvadore Rebello, Adv.

Ms. Aankhi Ghosh, Adv.

Mr. Shishir Deshpande, AOR

State of Manipur Mr. Leishangthem Roshmani KH, AOR

Ms. Anupama Ngangom, Adv.

Ms. Maibam Babina, Adv.

State of H.P. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, AAG

Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR

State of Rajasthan Dr. Manish Singhvi, AAG

Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Sailya Nanda Mishra, Adv.

Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR

State of Assam/Tripura Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Adv.

Mr. Kabir Shankar Bose, Adv.

Mr. Rijuk Sarkar, Adv.

State of Kerala Mr. G. Prakash, Adv.

Mr. Jishnu M.L., Adv.

Mrs. Priyanka Prakash, Adv.

Mrs. Beena Prakash, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

ORDER

5. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the signed order.

6. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

———

Exit mobile version