(Arun Mishra and S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ.)
Mahinder Singh & Ors. ___________________________ Appellant(s)
v.
State of Haryana & Ors. __________________________ Respondent(s)
Civil Appeal No. 6221 of 2018 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 17122/2018 @ D. No. 16907/2018], decided on July 9, 2018
With
C.A. No(s). 6225-6233/2018 @ SLP(C) Nos. 17113-17121/2018 @ D. No. 40109/2015 And C.A. No(s). 6223-6224/2018 @ SLP(C) Nos. 17111-17112/2018 @ D. No. 14698/2018 And C.A. No(s). 6222/2018 @ SLP(C) No. 17110/2018 @ D. No. 21563/2018
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
D. No. 16907/2018:
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. The appeal(s) is/are partly allowed in terms of the decision of this Court rendered on 17.11.2017, in Civil Appeal No. 19354/2017 (Rajender Singh v. State of Haryana).
4. As the special leave petition(s) has/have been filed with an effective delay of 880 days, it is made clear that the appellants shall not be entitled for any interest for the period of delay.
5. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
D. No. 40109/2015:
6. Delay in filing substitution application is condoned.
7. Substitution is allowed.
8. Permission to file SLP is granted.
9. Delay in refiling SLP is condoned.
10. Leave granted.
11. The appeal(s) is/are partly allowed in terms of the decision of this Court rendered on 17.11.2017, in Civil Appeal No. 19354/2017 (Rajender Singh v. State of Haryana).
12. As the special leave petition(s) is/are refiled with an effective delay of 220 days, it is made clear that the appellant(s) shall not be entitled for any interest for the period of delay.
13. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
D. No. 14698/2015:
14. Delay condoned.
15. Leave granted.
16. The appeal(s) is/are partly allowed in terms of the decision of this Court rendered on 17.11.2017, in Civil Appeal No. 19354/2017 (Rajender Singh v. State of Haryana).
17. As the special leave petition(s) has/have been filed with an effective delay of 870 days, it is made clear that the appellant(s) shall not be entitled for any interest for the period of delay.
18. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
D. No. 21563/2018:
19. Delay condoned.
20. Leave granted.
21. The appeal(s) is/are partly allowed in terms of the decision of this Court rendered on 17.11.2017, in Civil Appeal No. 19354/2017 (Rajender Singh v. State of Haryana).
22. As the special leave petition(s) has/have been filed with an effective delay of 825 days, it is made clear that the appellant(s) shall not be entitled for any interest for the period of delay.
23. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) ….…./2018 (D.No(s). 16907/2018)
Mahinder Singh & Ors ____________________________ Petitioner(s)
v.
The State of Haryana & Ors ________________________ Respondent(s)
(With appln for c/delay in filing SLP)
WITH
Diary No(s). 40109/2015 (IV-B)
(With appln for c/delay in refiling, substitution, permission to file SLP, c/delay in filing substitution,
Diary No(s). 14698/2018 (IV-B)
(With appln for c/delay in filing SLP)
Diary No(s). 21563/2018 (IV-B)
(With appln for c/delay in filing SLP, exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment)
Date: 09-07-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.
(Before Arun Mishra and S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ.)
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bankey Bihari, AOR
Ms. Smita Maan, Adv.
Mr. Satyawan Rathi, Adv.
Mr. Vishal Maan, Adv.
Mr. N.S. Dalal, Adv.
Mr. D.P. Singh, Adv.
for Mr. R.C. Kaushik, AOR
Mr. Anil Mittal, Adv.
for Dr. Kailash Chand, AOR
Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav, AOR
For Respondent(s) Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv.
Ms. Manpreet Kaur Bhalla, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
ORDER
24. Delay condoned.
25. Leave granted.
26. The appeals are partly allowed in terms of the signed order.
———
