(Kurian Joseph and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ.)
Mahender Singh and Ors. ___________________________ Appellant(s)
v.
Managing Director, HSIDC and Ors. ________________ Respondent(s)
Civil Appeal No. 8862 of 2016 [@ Special Leave Petition (C) No. 26699 of 2016] [@ SLP (C)……CC No. 16033 of 2016], decided on September 9, 2016
The Judgement of the Court was delivered by
Kurian, J.:—
1. Applications for permission to file Special Leave Petition are allowed.
2. Delay condoned. Application for substitution is allowed.
3. Leave granted.
4. The issue in this appeal pertains to the claim for higher compensation made by the appellants. The learned counsel for the State of Haryana fairly submitted that the claim for compensation is covered by the decision of this Court in “Sachin v. State of Haryana” passed in Civil Appeal No. 3412 of 2015, decided on 31.03.2015, whereby the cut in the development charges has been reduced from 40% to 30%.
5. Therefore, this appeal is disposed of in terms of the above referred Judgment.
6. We make it clear that in this appeal, the appellants will not be entitled to statutory benefits for the period of delay in refiling the petition before this Court.
7. No costs.
———
