(Madan B. Lokur, S. Abdul Nazeer and Deepak Gupta, JJ.)
M.C. Mehta ______________________________________ Petitioner;
v.
Union of India and Others _________________________ Respondent(s).
In Re: Report Nos. 86 and 88 Submitted by EPCA (Regarding Status of Funds and Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Buses)
Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 13029/1985, decided on August 13, 2018
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
IN RE: REPORT NOS. 86 AND 88 SUBMITTED BY EPCA (HYDROGEN FUEL-CELL BUSES)
1. Pursuant to our order dated 23-7-20181, a positive affidavit has been filed by the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
2. It is stated in the affidavit that a study is being carried out by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. for using a mixture of hydrogen and CNG as fuel for buses. It is further stated that the study will take about six months or so with implementation thereafter as a pilot project. It is also stated in the affidavit that an amount of Rs. 14 crores would be required for implementing the project towards capital expenditure.
3. Since there is a sufficient amount lying in the Environment Compensation Charge (ECC), an amount of Rs. 15 crores may be sanctioned to the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. for carrying out its study and the pilot project.
4. List the matter on 28th November, 2018.
Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 13029/1985
M.C. Mehta ______________________________________ Petitioner
v.
Union of India and Others ______________________ Respondent(s)
(4) IA NO. 47751/2017 (APPLN. FOR VACATION OF STAY GRANTED VIDE ORDER DT. 30.4.2010 ON B/O DIRECTORATE OF ESTATES)
Date : 13-08-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.
(Before Madan B. Lokur, S. Abdul Nazeer and Deepak Gupta, JJ.)
Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. (A.C.) [NP]
Ms. Aparajita Singh, Adv. (A.C.)
Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv. (A.C.)
Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Adv. (A.C.)
For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person
For Respondent(s) Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG
Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG
Mr. S.W.A. Qadri, Adv.
Mr. D.L. Chidanand, Adv.
Mr. Devasis Bharuka, Adv.
Ms. Suhasini Sen, Adv.
Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Adv.
Mr. Raj Bahadur, Adv.
Ms. Snidha Mehra, Adv.
Mr. G.S. Makker, Advocate
Mr. Ajay Bansal, AAG
Mr. Anil Grover, AAG
Ms. Noopur Singhal, Adv.
Mr. Gaurav Yadava, Adv.
Ms. Veena Bansal, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Kr. Visen, Advocate
Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek, Advocate
Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG
Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv.
Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv.
Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, Adv.
Ms. Indira Bhakar, Adv.
Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advocate
Mr. B.V. Balramdas, Advocate
Ms. Anil Katiyar, Advocate
Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Sandeep Narain, Adv.
Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Adv.
Ms. Anjali Agarwal, Adv.
for M/S. S Narain And Co.
Mr. Rohit K. Singh, Advocate
Mr. Rohit Narayan, Advocate
Mr. Faisal Sherwani, Advocate
Mr. S.N. Terdel, Advocate
Mr. Akshat Hansaria, Adv.
Mr. Akash Chatterjee, Adv.
Mr. D.N. Goburdhun, Adv.
Ms. Pallavi Chopra, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
ORDER
5. The application is dismissed.
———
1 M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, WP (C) No. 13029 of 1985, order dated 23-7-2018 (SC)
