(Dipak Misra, C.J. and A.M. Khanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.)
Kanika Goel ______________________________________ Appellant
v.
State of Delhi Thr. SHO & Anr. __________________ Respondent(s)
M.A. No. 2194 of 2018 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 635-640 of 2018, decided on August 20, 2018
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. Heard Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, learned counsel for the appellant and Dr. A.M. Singhvi, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, learned counsel for respondent No. 2.
2. The present application has been filed on the ground that this Court while delivering the judgment on 20.07.2018 has noted that the custody proceedings are pending before the Family Court at Patiala House, New Delhi, which is factually not correct.
3. In view of the aforesaid, we direct that wherever this Court has stated that “the custody proceedings are pending before the Family Court at Patiala House, New Delhi” and has even observed that “both the parties shall cooperate for disposal of the case” the same shall stand deleted.
4. Needless to say, all other aspects and analysis made in the judgment shall remain undisturbed.
5. M.A. stands disposed of accordingly.
MA 2194/2018 in Crl.A. No(s).635-640/2018
Kanika Goel ______________________________________ Petitioner
v.
State of Delhi Thr. Sho & Anr ____________________ Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and IA No. 103347/2018-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION)
Date : 20-08-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.
(Before Dipak Misra, C.J. and A.M. Khanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.)
For Petitioner(s) Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Adv.
Ms. Rytim Vohra, Adv.
Ms. Arpita Rai, Adv.
Ms. Akriti Tyagi, Adv.
Ms. Udita Singh, Adv.
Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv.
Mr. Lakshmi Raman Singh, AOR
For Respondent(s) Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv.
For R. No. 2 Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Adv.
Mr. S.S. Jauhar, Adv.
For R. No. 1 Mr. Sanjiv Das, Adv.
Mr. B.V. Balram Das, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
ORDER
6. MA stands disposed of in terms of the signed order.
———
