Latest Judgments

Kalpana Misra & Ors. v. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Through Registrar General & Ors.

Having heard learned counsel for the rival parties, we are of the view, that the petitioners should have approached the High Court under Article 226 rather than approached this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.

(Jagdish Singh Khehar and Arun Mishra, JJ.)

Kalpana Misra & Ors. _____________________________ Petitioner(s)

v.

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Through Registrar General & Ors. ___________________________________________ Respondent(s)

(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim stay and permission to file additional documents and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and office report)

Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 322/2016, decided on July 1, 2016

The Order of the court was delivered by

Order

1. Having heard learned counsel for the rival parties, we are of the view, that the petitioners should have approached the High Court under Article 226 rather than approached this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. In view of the above, liberty is granted to the petitioners to move the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India within three weeks from today. After the pleadings are complete, we would request the High Court to dispose of the matter on merits within a period of four months from today.

2. The instant petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

3. As a sequel to the above, all pending interlocutory applications also stand disposed of.

———

Exit mobile version