Latest Judgments

Commr. of Income Tax, Rajkot v. Hansaguri Prafulchandra Ladhani & Ors.

Looking at the smallness of the amount involved in the present Appeals, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.

(R.K. Agrawal and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, JJ.)

Commr. of Income Tax, Rajkot ______________________ Appellant

v.

Hansaguri Prafulchandra Ladhani & Ors. _____________ Respondent(s)

Civil Appeal No. 4216/2011, decided on March 30, 2017

With

C.A. No. 293/2014, C.A. No. 2580/2014, SLP (C) No. 4007/2014 and C.A. No. 5101/2015

The Order of the court was delivered by

Order

1. Looking at the smallness of the amount involved in the present Appeals, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.

2. Therefore, the Civil Appeals and the Special Leave Petition are dismissed.

3. However, the question of law is left open.

Civil Appeal No. 4216/2011

Commr. of Income Tax, Rajkot ________________________ Appellant

v.

Hansaguri Prafulchandra Ladhani & Ors. _____________ Respondent(s)

WITH

C.A. No. 293/2014, C.A. No. 2580/2014, SLP(C) No. 4007/2014, C.A. No. 5101/2015

Date : 30/03/2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

(Before R.K. Agrawal and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, JJ.)

For Appellant(s) Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv.

Mr. S.A. Haseeb, Adv.

Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv.

Ms. Parul Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Maibam N. Singh, Adv.

Mr. Pramod Dayal, Adv.

Mr. R.N. Poddar, Adv.

Mr. S.K. Ray, Adv.

Mr. Amitava Poddar, Adv.

Mr. D.L. Chidanand, Adv.

Ms. Meenakshi Midha, Adv.

Mr. Akhil A. Roy, Adv.

For Mr. C.S. Ashri, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

Order

4. The Civil Appeals and the Special Leave Petition are dismissed in terms of the signed order.

———

Exit mobile version