(Dipak Misra, C.J. and A.M. Khanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.)
Chitra Sharma & Ors. _____________________________ Petitioner(s)
v.
Union of India & Ors. ___________________________ Respondent(s)
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 744/2017, decided on July 13, 2018
(With appln.(s) for impleading party, clarification/direction, intervention and stay) With S.L.P.(C) No. 24001/2017 (XI) W.P.(C) No. 782/2017 (X) W.P.(C) No. 803/2017 (X) W.P.(C) No. 860/2017 (X) W.P.(C) No. 783/2017 (X) W.P.(C) No. 805/2017 (X) (With appln.(s) for stay) S.L.P.(C) No. 24002/2017 (XI) (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP/TP, permission to file additional documents, intervention/impleadment, clarification/direction and impleading party) W.P.(C) No. 950/2017 (X) S.L.P.(C) No. 36396/2017 (XI) (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, for impleadment of respondents, permission to file SLP/TP, permission to file additional documents and clarification/direction) Diary No. 33267/2017 (XI) (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, intervention/impleadment, permission to file SLP/TP, c/delay in refiling and permission to file lengthy list of dates) W.P.(C) No. 511/2018 (X) (With appln.(s) for interim relief)
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. Mr. Fali S. Nariman, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents, has given certain proposals. The same are seriously opposed to by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Hence, we are not inclined to entertain the said proposals.
2. Let the matter be listed on 16th July, 2018, exclusively for the purpose of considering the issue of the rights of the home buyers and the capability of JAL and JIL to construct the projects.
3. Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, learned senior counsel appearing for the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) is requested to remain present on the next date of hearing to assist the Court. That apart, learned counsel who are opposing the proposals, are directed to file written notes of submissions. Oral submissions by the learned counsel shall be restricted to five minutes each. Needless to say, each counsel shall address the Court only once and multiple submissions shall not be entertained.
———
