(H.L. Dattu, C.J. and Arun Mishra and Amitava Roy, JJ.)
Center For Integrity, Governance and Training in Vigilance Administration and Anr. __________________________ Petitioner(s)
v.
Union of India and Ors. __________________________ Respondent(s)
Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 683/2014, decided on May 13, 2015
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. By our order dated 17.12.2014, while recording the submissions made by Shri Mukul Rohatgi, learned Attorney General for India, we had stated that they can proceed with the selection process, but before any appointments are made, they should take the leave of the Court.
2. Learned Attorney General would request us to permit them to proceed further in the matter in accordance with Section 4(1) of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 (for short, “the Act”).
3. Keeping in view the urgency and importance of the appointments of the Central Vigilance Commissioner and the Vigilance Commissioner, which are kept vacant from the last few months, we permit them to proceed further in accordance with Section 4(1) of the Act.
4. After such appointments are made, the learned Attorney General would produce a copy of the order and the entire original record before this Court.
5. All the contentions of both the parties are left open.
6. Call this matter after the ensuing summer vacation.
———
