(Rohinton Fali Nariman and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ.)
C.I.T. New Delhi _________________________________ Appellant;
v.
Spice Enfotainment Ltd. __________________________ Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 285 of 2014, decided on November 2, 2017
With
Civil Appeal No. 286 of 2014 Civil Appeal No. 3125 of 2015 S.L.P. (C) No. 8944 of 2015 S.L.P. (C) No. 8941 of 2015 Civil Appeal No. 4317 of 2015 S.L.P. (C) No. 29956 of 2015 S.L.P. (C) CC No. 10887 of 2015 Civil Appeal No. 3625 of 2015 Civil Appeal Nos. 4318-4319 of 2015 S.L.P. (C) CC Nos. 12150-12151 of 2015 Civil Appeal No. 6580 of 2015 Civil Appeal No. 6052 of 2015 Civil Appeal No. 6581 of 2015 Civil Appeal No. 3284 of 2017 Civil Appeal No. 8030 of 2015 Civil Appeal No. 3285 of 2017 S.L.P. (C) No. 28331 of 2015 Civil Appeal No. 13763 of 2015 Civil Appeal No. 4447 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. 663 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. 672 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. 662 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. 4449 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. 2608 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. 1602 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. 1603 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. 6058 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. 6984 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. 6985 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. 12045 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. 3277 of 2017
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. Delay condoned.
2. Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the parties.
3. We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment(s) passed by the High Court.
4. In view of this, we find no merit in the appeals and special leave petitions.
5. Accordingly, the appeals and special leave petitions are dismissed.
———
