(Ranjan Gogoi and Navin Sinha, JJ.)
Bhoora _________________________________________ Appellant
v.
State of U.P. ____________________________________ Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 594 of 2017 [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 8890 of 2016], decided on March 28, 2017
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. Leave granted.
2. We have heard learned counsels for the parties.
3. The accused-appellant who is facing trial for the offences punishable under Sections 392, 411, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code is in custody since 18.08.2013. The main witnesses have been examined and co-accused have been released on bail.
4. Having regard to the above and the period of custody suffered by the accused-appellant and the period likely to be taken for conclusion of the trial, we are of the view that the accused-appellant should be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal, U.P. in connection with Criminal Case No. 215 of 2013, P.S. Asmauli, District Sambhal, U.P. We order accordingly.
5. The learned trial Court is free to impose all such conditions as it may deem fit.
6. The order of the High Court is set aside and the appeal is allowed.
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8890/2016
Bhoora ___________________________________________ Petitioner
v.
State of U.P _______________________________________ Respondent
(With interim relief and office report)
Date : 28/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.
(Before Ranjan Gogoi and Navin Sinha, JJ.)
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bipin Kumar Jha, Adv.
Mr. Adeel Sidiqui, Adv.
Mr. Akhilesh Kr. Pandey, Adv.
For Mr. Ajay Kumar Talesara, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
ORDER
7. Leave granted.
8. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order.
———
