(Jagdish Singh Khehar and Arun Mishra, JJ.)
M/s. CFS Assn. of India ____________________________ Petitioner
v.
Union of India & Ors. ___________________________ Respondent(s)
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30923/2011, decided on July 5, 2016
(With appln.(s) for intervention and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report)
(For final disposal) With SLP(C) No. 30922/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited our attention to the report of the Technical Committee, constituted for making recommendations on the maintenance of minimum distance between hazardous cargo and general cargo, as well as, between hazardous cargo and admininstrative buildings in the customs area. It was pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner, that while express recommendations have been made with reference to the distance between hazardous cargo and admininstrative buildings in the customs area, no concrete determination has been rendered with reference to the minimum distance required to be maintained between hazardous cargo and general cargo.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent – Union of India states, that the aforesaid mistake has occurred on account of oversight, and that, a clarification will be recorded on the above aspect of the matter, by the Technical Committee, within four weeks from today.
3. Let the clarification recorded by the Technical Committee be placed on the record of this case within four weeks from today.
4. Post thereafter.
———
